bloggeranon ([info]bloggeranon) wrote,
@ 2007-11-06 08:51:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood:awake

"The grapes were sour"
read a friends status message, but that's a story that every one knows. Whats new? Hmmm...I'll give you a boring story with interesting thought questions.

I bought a metallic blue car which I happen to appreciate every time I drive to the point of it being a fixation. A friend said the car is too purple for his taste. I however couldn't see myself choose any other color, because the simple reason was that this color defined the car best. However I didn't say that. I said there were 4 choices. The grey was too boring. Who buys white? The red was too in-the-face and not available anyway. So, blue it was and then these profound (:D) words spewed "You live with your choices". He offered some consolatory words to this philosophical resignation.

The truth was a simple "I liked the color". The prevarication was the rationalization. I chose color for the story but that's a head-fake in Randy Pausch terms, just like this link is.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/06/science/06tier.html?ref=science




(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]smriti
2007-11-10 12:04 am UTC (link)
I woke up on the belligerent side of the bed today, but did you have a point?
Perhaps you should state the interesting thought questions for people like me, but yeahhhhh, that takes too much time :D

"On the other hand" (from emeritusl's recent post on the same thing, which links to Scott Adam's blog): ah, writing for readers - I feel your pain. We'd rather be abstract and say only enough for ourselves to understand later :) Speaking, now that is so much easier... :-(

(I gave the belligerent disclaimer, did I not?)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Fair enuff
[info]bloggeranon
2007-11-10 09:55 am UTC (link)
I don't see what I could have been offended with. Should I say defensive stuff like "The purpose of the paragraph is to force the reader into thinking up the questions." or agree with the "Notes to myself" description? Unfortunately the answer is an equally lame "both" :D
Ah finally, Point taken. If this was meant to be for the "reader" it fails utterly indeed, but do I care?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Fair enuff
[info]smriti
2007-11-10 05:34 pm UTC (link)
I didn't say you had to be offended. I said I was being belligerent. Quite different, the two.

Let's put it this way: My comment was not meant for the 'reader' either :p Which is why it segued into a "we" and "us" of the Notes to Myself kind of people :) (not you and me, but the general "we" of the 'notes to myself' kind)

I didn't know you'd read Notes to Myself (?) Doesn't seem like 'your kind of book' :D

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…